Periods will no longer stop girls from studying! A historic Supreme Court decision that you need to understand
The Supreme Court acknowledged that the lack of menstrual hygiene management (MHM) prevents girls from attending school, thereby violating their dignity, privacy, bodily autonomy, and reproductive health. This situation is a clear violation of Article 14 (Right to Equality), Article 15(3) (Special provisions for women and children), Article 21 (Right to life and personal liberty), and Article 21A (Right to education). New Delhi – In a very important and far-reaching decision on January 30, the Supreme Court declared menstrual health an integral part of the right to life under Article 21 and the right to education under Article 21A of the Indian Constitution. A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan delivered a detailed 126-page judgment in the case of Dr. Jaya Thakur vs. Union of India, in which the Court clearly stated that the absence of girls from school or dropping out entirely due to menstruation is unconstitutional. The Court said, “A period ends a sentence – not a girl’s education.” In the judgment, the Court acknowledged that the lack of menstrual hygiene management (MHM) prevents girls from attending school, thereby violating their dignity, privacy, bodily autonomy, and reproductive health. This situation is a clear violation of Article 14 (Right to Equality), Article 15(3) (Special provisions for women and children), Article 21 (Right to life and personal liberty), and Article 21A (Right to education). The Court stated that the right to live a life of dignity is only possible when girls can attend school during menstruation without shame, fear, or discomfort. The Court also analyzed Sections 3 and 19 of the RTE Act (2009) and clarified that “free education” means not only school fees but also includes all expenses and facilities related to menstrual hygiene management. If girls do not have access to sanitary napkins or if there are no separate, clean toilets in schools, it is a violation of the RTE Act. The court stated that “barrier-free access” in schools means not only access to the building but also the removal of all obstacles that prevent a child from attending school regularly. Under Section 3 of the RTE Act, free education includes not only school fees but also expenses related to menstrual hygiene management. The lack of separate toilets in schools is a violation of “barrier-free access.” Menstruation is no longer just a “women’s issue”; it is a collective responsibility. Under this judgment, the Supreme Court has issued strict instructions to all states and Union Territories to mandatorily provide the following facilities within three months: Every school (government or private) must have separate, fully functional toilets for boys and girls, with running water, soap, and privacy. Toilets must also be accessible for children with disabilities. Oxo-biodegradable sanitary napkins (meeting ASTM D-6954 standards) will be provided free of charge in every school, ideally through vending machines. If installing a machine is not immediately possible, these napkins will be kept at a designated place or with a designated person in the school. An “MHM Corner” will be established in every school, where spare undergarments, spare uniforms, disposable bags, and other necessary materials will be kept to deal with any emergencies during menstruation. Arrangements for the safe and environmentally friendly disposal of sanitary napkins must be made in every school, in accordance with the Solid Waste Management Rules. The court placed great emphasis on awareness and education. NCERT and SCERT have been directed to include menstruation, puberty, and problems like PCOS/PCOD in the curriculum to eliminate the shame and myths associated with it among girls. Training on sensitivity and support regarding menstrual health will be mandatory for all teachers (both male and female). The court specifically stated that it is also essential to educate boys that menstruation is a normal biological process, so that they can show empathy and respect towards their female classmates. For monitoring, the District Education Officer (DEO) has been ordered to inspect schools annually and collect anonymous feedback (surveys) from female students. The NCPCR and SCPCR have been entrusted with the responsibility of monitoring the implementation of this decision across the country. Non-compliance could lead to action, including the cancellation of the school’s recognition under Section 18 of the RTE Act. The court concluded with an emotional appeal, stating that this decision is not just a legal document, but for every girl who has been forced to drop out of school due to menstruation. The court said, “The fault is not yours. The change has now begun.” This case is still “part-heard.” Compliance reports have been sought from all states and union territories after three months. The Supreme Court has directed that this decision be communicated to all High Courts, state governments, and the Ministries of Education, Health, Jal Shakti, and Women and Child Development. Geetha Sunil Pillai Courtesy: Hindi News
Talks with Rahul smooth: Kanimozhi
Chennai: DMK deputy general secretary Kanimozhi Karunanidhi on Friday said her recent meeting with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was “smooth” and dismissed speculations about a possible rift between the long-time allies. She said chief minister M K Stalin will make announcements regarding seat negotiations. In a related development, TNCC chief K Selvaperunthagai told TOI that seat-sharing talks with DMK are anticipated next week. Kanimozhi’s meeting with Rahul Gandhi took place in New Delhi in the wake of senior Congress functionaries going public with their demand for power sharing. “As far as I know, there is no conflict. The discussions were cordial,” the DMK leader told reporters in Tirunelveli. Kanimozhi said there was a possibility of new parties joining DMK-led alliance and Stalin would decide on them. The DMK is likely to allocate two more seats to Congress, in addition to 25 offered in the 2021 assembly election. DMK sources told TOI that discussions at Rahul’s Delhi residence that lasted around 45 minutes, “resolved” the issue of power sharing, and Congress leadership “understood that it was not possible” in Tamil Nadu. Leaders of both parties, however, did not wish to be quoted on the specifics of the talks on power-sharing. A senior DMK leader, who was privy to the meeting, said Congress high command held high respect for DMK and its leadership, and the long-standing alliance between the parties. “Both parties are ideologically aligned, and we do not wish to break ties,” the DMK leader said. Moreover, the Congress understands the significance of DMK’s strength as an ally and the support it will offer to Congress in the 2029 Lok Sabha elections, said another senior DMK leader. Rahul is believed to have expressed interest in commencing talks between the seat negotiation committees of both parties soon. During his interactions with senior TNCC functionaries in New Delhi recently, Rahul Gandhi sought their views on alliance with TVK. Many expressed a preference for continuing alliance with DMK with a decent number of seats. A senior leader bluntly told the leadership that severing ties with DMK would be suicidal for the party. In Tiruvarur, Selvaperunthagai described Kanimozhi’s meeting with Rahul Gandhi as “honest and dignified,” unlike AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami’s visit to Delhi. “We have not exerted pressure on our ally, DMK, nor will we. We will ask for whatever we want and get it,” he said. Congress general secretary (organisation) K C Venugopal is scheduled to flag off a padayatra by TNCC workers against VB-G RAM G in Chennai on Feb 5. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Congress leaders pay tribute to Mahatma Gandhi, protest changes to MGNREGA
Shimla: Chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, along with Congress leaders, paid floral tributes to the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi, on his death anniversary, observed as Martyrs’ Day, at the historic Ridge in Shimla on Friday. Following the tribute, the Congress leaders observed a two-hour fast from 11 am to 1 pm to protest against “renaming and dilution of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)” by the BJP-led Union govt. Addressing mediapersons, the CM alleged that the central govt not only altered the name of MGNREGA but also weakened the core objectives of the scheme. He said thw MGNREGA was earlier a strong pillar of rural employment, particularly benefiting youth and women, but opportunities under the scheme are now being steadily reduced. Sukhu highlighted that village pradhans earlier had the authority to undertake development works such as road construction under MGNREGA, which ensured employment close to people’s homes. He added that during the Covid-19 pandemic, the scheme played a vital role in providing employment to a large number of people. However, he expressed concern that the powers of panchayat pradhans are now curtailed. The CM added that for nearly two decades, MGNREGA guaranteed employment and also provided unemployment allowance when work was not made available. He said the two-hour fast was a symbolic protest against the systematic dismantling of the scheme. He also pointed out that while the central govt earlier bore 100% of the expenditure, it now shifted to a 90:10 funding pattern, which could adversely affect states like Himachal Pradesh. Responding to a question, Sukhu said he raised concerns over the proposed reduction in import duty on apples from New Zealand with Union minister Piyush Goyal, cautioning that it could severely impact apple growers in Himachal Pradesh. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Refusal to see caste discrimination, not ‘false complaints’, is the real crisis on campus
Little will change until institutes recognise the experiences of Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students. An Indian student during a protest rally against the government’s recommendation for 50% reservation for backward classes in education and government jobs, in this photograph from Bengaluru in May 2006. The University Grants Commission’s updated rules to address caste discrimination in higher education institutes have sparked outrage among Savarna commentators and students. They claim that they will become victims of false complaints and that the provisions will be weaponised against them. But this reflects a continuing refusal to listen to experiences of caste discrimination on campuses, something I have witnessed closely since 2022 when I became the first elected student representative of the Equal Opportunity Cell at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. As part of student committees and through my research on caste injustice, I have seen how the claim that Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students misuse guidelines against general category students is invoked when a caste discrimination complaint is filed. This negative framing favours the student or professor accused of casteism and rarely accounts for the humiliation or insensitive behaviour faced by the student making the complaint. Over the past few days, Savarna students have framed themselves as potential victims of the UGC rules, issued on January 13, recentering the issue of casteist discrimination around their anxieties. On January 29, the Supreme Court stayed the new rules after hearing a public interest litigation which claimed that the guidelines were vague and could be misused. Akhil Kang, a queer Dalit scholar who has extensively written about “upper-caste victimhood”, argues that claims of upper-caste victimhood are not about actual harm. Instead, they are about preserving moral innocence in the face of caste accountability. Illustrating Kang’s observation, upper-caste students are floating hypothetical situations in which they could be victimised by the UGC guidelines. For example, one Instagram post claims that a general category female student is now afraid of being accused of caste discrimination if she rejects the advances of a male student from the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe category. Such claims displace attention from the everyday experiences of discrimination of Dalit and Adivasi students, who remain unacknowledged in classrooms and are rendered invisible on campuses where merit is routinely read through caste. Caste on campus As part of a meeting called by the National Task Force set up by the Supreme Court on January 12, I highlighted three crucial observations based on my experience of observing casteism on campus. The meeting was attended by anti-caste intellectuals, academics, activists and student representatives from universities in Delhi. First, caste is seemingly invisible and so it is difficult to prove that it exists. But the discriminatory effects of caste are primarily experienced by Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students. For example, a professor may make a student wait outside their office hours every day just to address one concern or speak to them. The student could wait for days on end, often feeling humiliated. But this will not be recognised as “casteism”. This same professor could ask about the student’s rank in the entrance exam – using the phrase “hawa kya hai?”, or what’s the AIR, or all India rank. Ambedkarite student collectives across the IITs have stressed that asking a student’s rank should be counted as caste discrimination. Rank indicates whether a student was admitted in the general or Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students. The student might then be labelled incompetent and underperforming, and the professor could suggest that they be expelled from IIT Delhi for not being meritorious. The student could find their admission and place at the institute being attacked and so end up writing to the administration and Equal Opportunity Cell, or SC/ST cell, seeking legal recourse. The Equal Opportunity Cell registers the student’s complaint, and thereafter, a committee is set up to inquire into caste discrimination. This illustrates how faculty and resource persons in an institution refuse to listen to a student who feels neglected or socially excluded. Congress workers protest against the death by suicide of doctoral scholar Rohith Vemula, in this photograph from January 2016. Credit: AFP. Second, caste reveals itself through networks and support systems. A general category student might instantly feel a sense of belonging in the classroom while a Dalit, Adivasi or OBC student may continuously invest energy in proving or defending their merit. As a student representative, I have observed that the network of Savarna scholars does not easily offer support to Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students and often has preconceived notions about who is meritorious or deserving. Savarna students travel easily through these networks, receiving guidance on scholarships abroad, building academic connections, seeking funding and finding opportunities to get published. But Dalit students have to hustle merely to get signatures on recommendation letters. Even if students have got admission on merit, they are always made to feel inadequate. “No matter how I perform, I feel invisible in the classroom,” a Dalit BTech student told me off the record on campus. “The Savarna professor never acknowledges my greeting.” Such an environment attacks the confidence of Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students. The demoralisation shows itself in lesser grades, poor progress reports and lonely or isolated students in campus spaces. It is a challenge to define this experience of being made to feel invisible, but what can be defined are broader actions – the implicit or explicit bias on the campus. Many Dalit and Adivasi scholars report feeling depressed, which I believe is a result of an uncaring institutional structure that does not provide motivation, appreciation nor respond to their efforts properly. In 2022, I emailed the IIT-Delhi mental health team asking why caste-based trauma was missing from the counselling options of gender, LGBTQ+, violence, relationship problems and campus problems. It was aimed at making the institute recognise the reality of the trauma of caste. IIT-Delhi positively implemented this, by adding “caste-based trauma” as an option on its YourDost website, which provides counselling to enrolled students. The third observation was the
Evening news wrap: Ajit Pawar laid to rest, govt assures time-bound probe into plane crash, and more
Ajit Pawar laid to rest: Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar was cremated with full state honours in Baramati as the civil aviation ministry assured a time-bound probe into the Learjet 45 plane crash that killed him and four others. SC halts new UGC rules: The Supreme Court stayed the UGC’s new higher education regulations amid nationwide protests and issued notices to the Centre and the commission on petitions challenging the rules. Economic Survey projects 7.4% growth: The Economic Survey 2025–26 projected India’s GDP growth at 7.4% for FY26 and said inflation was at historic lows despite global economic uncertainties. Tharoor meets Congress leadership: Congress leader Shashi Tharoor met Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge, dismissing speculation of differences and saying he was on the same page with the party leadership. Minor sexually assaulted in Delhi: A six-year-old girl was allegedly sexually assaulted in northeast Delhi’s Bhajanpura, with two minor accused held, one absconding, and locals staging a protest demanding justice. Here are five news from the day: Ajit Pawar laid to rest, govt assures time-bound probe into plane crash Ajit Pawar was given full state honours as his body was taken to the Vidya Pratishthan ground for the funeral, while supporters assembled outside Ahilyabai Holkar Government Medical College to bid him a final farewell. The ministry of civil aviation (MoCA) issued a statement on the probe into the plane crash at Baramati airport that killed Maharashtra deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar and four others on Wednesday. The ministry said the probe into the Learjet 45 aircraft crash is progressing expeditiously. Read full story SC stays new UGC rules amid uproar The Supreme Court put on hold the UGC’s new regulations for higher education institutions, which were framed to promote equality, following widespread protests over the rules’ contentious definition of discrimination. A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notices to the Centre and the UGC on petitions challenging the regulation. Read full story Tharoor meets Rahul, Kharge, says ‘we are all on same page’ Congress leader Shashi Tharoor met party president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi amid speculation about differences between him and the party leadership. After meeting Rahul Gandhi and Kharge, Tharoor asserted that “all is good” and that he was on the “same page” with the Congress leadership. Read full story 6-year-old girl sexually assaulted in Delhi; 2 boys held, one absconding A six-year-old girl was sexually assaulted, allegedly by three boys, aged between nine and 16 years, in northeast Delhi’s Bhajanpura. A case was registered under Pocso Act and two of the boys were apprehended. The survivor’s family and neighbours are said to have blocked a road on Monday in protest against the incident that had taken place in the evening of Jan 18. Read full story GDP growth pegged at 7.4%, inflation at historic lows, says Economic Survey 2025-26 India is likely to remain the fastest-growing major economy, with real GDP growth estimated at 7.4% in FY26 despite global headwinds such as geopolitical tensions, fragmented trade and financial vulnerabilities, according to the Economic Survey 2025–26. Presented in Parliament by Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, the survey said India’s macroeconomic foundations had improved on the back of strong domestic demand, prudent fiscal consolidation and a healthier financial sector, while stressing the need for strategic resilience amid rapid changes in the global economic order. Follow live updates Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
‘All is good’: Shashi Tharoor meets Mallikarjun Kharge, Rahul Gandhi – Inside details of nearly 2-hour meeting
NEW DELHI: After weeks of visible discomfort, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Lok Sabha leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi finally met the senior leader Shashi Tharoor on Thursday. The PTI sources described it as a detailed “redressal” meeting ahead of the crucial Kerala assembly polls. The meeting, held in Kharge’s chamber in the Parliament House complex, lasted for over an hour and forty-five minutes and came amid party concerns that the Tharoor episode could snowball into a larger messaging problem in Kerala, where Congress is pushing hard to return to power after a decade in opposition. Emerging from the meeting, Tharoor struck a deliberately upbeat tone. “We had a discussion with my two party leaders, the LoP and the Congress president. We had a very good, constructive, positive discussion,” he told reporters. Shutting down recent speculations, he said, “All is good and we are moving together on the same page. What more can I say.” — ShashiTharoor (@ShashiTharoor) Inside the meeting Sources told news agency PTI that it was a “comprehensive” meeting in which “a wide array of subjects were covered” and that Kharge and Gandhi made “the time necessary for a thorough discussion.” Tharoor later reinforced the truce with a post on X, thanking both leaders for a “warm and constructive discussion” and repeating the now-official line that they were “all on the same page” as the party moves forward “in the service of the people of India.” A photo from the meeting showing Tharoor, Rahul and Kharge smiling was also put out on social media. What wasn’t discussed: CM face Asked if the issue of the chief ministerial face for Kerala was discussed, Tharoor attempted to close that door firmly. “That was never the issue,” he said, adding: “I am not interested in being the candidate for anything. At the moment I am already an MP … I have their interest to look after in Parliament, that is my job.” The meeting comes after Tharoor was reportedly upset about the treatment meted out to him at a recent Kochi event and what his camp saw as attempts by some state leaders to sideline him. The immediate tipping point, sources close to him had said, was Rahul Gandhi allegedly not acknowledging Tharoor on stage at the ‘Maha Panchayath’ in Kochi on January 19, even while mentioning other leaders. Tharoor, a four-time MP and one of the Congress Working Committee members from Kerala, was present on the dais. Soon after, he skipped a key Kerala strategy meeting chaired by Kharge, triggering speculation that internal tensions were deepening at precisely the wrong moment. Congress is seeking to wrest power from the Left after 10 years in opposition. In that backdrop, the last thing the leadership can afford is the spectacle of internal rivalries, especially when the BJP is also attempting to expand its footprint and the LDF remains organisationally tight. A senior Congress source told PTI: the “proof of the pudding will be in the eating” and the next few weeks will show whether the “same page” line translates into actual political coordination. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Modi Playing the Dalit Caste Card to Push Rahul Gandhi Out of the Ring and Don the Mantle of Dalit Messiah
The Supreme Court’s decision to stay the recent University Grants Commission (UGC) regulation on the ground that it adopted a non-inclusive definition of caste-based discrimination and excluded certain categories from institutional protection is certainly not a setback for Narendra Modi. Instead, it could significantly elevate his stature in the eyes of Dalits and the poor. Politically, the most important observation made by the bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi—“If we don’t intervene, it will lead to dangerous consequences, divide society, and have grave impact”—will have far-reaching implications. The court also observed that by limiting the scope of “caste-based discrimination” only to SC, ST, and OBC categories, the UGC had effectively denied institutional protection and grievance redressal to individuals belonging to the “general” or non-reserved categories who may also face harassment or bias based on caste identity. However, this order also raises a crucial question: why did the court not take suo motu cognisance when hundreds of SC, ST, and OBC students in IITs and IIMs allegedly died by suicide due to discrimination? With the epithet “Hindu Hridaya Samrat” losing relevance amid the mushrooming of multiple claimants, Narendra Modi appears to have chosen a new path in saffron politics—to don the crown of a Dalit Messiah. For the first time in his eleven-year rule as Prime Minister, Modi has made a politically astute move by antagonising traditional upper-caste supporters through measures perceived as protective of Dalits and marginalised students. Modi refused to heed the advice of friends and well-wishers to retrace his steps, despite being aware of the consequences. Some protesters even targeted his caste identity, claiming that “the Teli is out to destroy our future” (Modi belongs to the Teli community, an OBC group). Yet Modi appears unmoved. He seems confident that upper-caste voters will not desert the BJP despite their anger over the new rules. With the 2029 Lok Sabha election in view, winning over Dalits and EBCs appears to be at the top of his priority list. Shivam Singh, one of the founders of the Savarna Sena (Forward Caste Army), stated that protests would be withdrawn if the government assured that general-category students would not be affected. Data shows that complaints related to caste discrimination in universities were around 173 in 2016–17 but rose to over 350 in the 2023–24 academic year, indicating a significant increase. Even memories of 1990, when upper-caste youth launched violent protests against the implementation of the Mandal Commission report, do not seem to deter Modi. During that agitation, over 150 people attempted suicide, with at least 63 succumbing to their injuries. The protest, which began after Prime Minister V.P. Singh announced the implementation of the Mandal Report, turned violent as many students resorted to self-immolation. Rajeev Goswami’s attempt became the symbolic face of the agitation. The compulsion to identify with Dalits and the proletariat has become so acute for Modi’s political survival that he has sought to reinvent himself as a modern Dalit Messiah. This shift also reflects the rise of hardline Hindutva leaders such as Yogi Adityanath within the BJP ecosystem, many of whom are associated with the “Hindu Hridaya Samrat” image. Modi, unwilling to be overshadowed by any rival within the saffron camp, appears determined to chart an independent path by aligning himself with Dalits and EBCs. Recent political developments have significantly strengthened Rahul Gandhi’s appeal among Dalits. What was once a peripheral issue has become a central ideological plank of his leadership as Leader of the Opposition. Although the Congress had historically lost Dalit trust in the 1990s, Rahul Gandhi has attempted to reclaim this space by linking social justice with the demand for a caste census—what he calls an “X-ray of the country.” He is increasingly perceived by Dalits and EBCs as a potential liberator. By placing the caste census at the centre of his political narrative, Rahul Gandhi has moved beyond tokenism. He aims to demonstrate the underrepresentation of Dalits, Adivasis, and OBCs in corporate, media, and academic institutions. He has targeted what he calls BJP’s “Manuvaad” and accused the government of weakening constitutional protections for marginalised communities. His claim that 95 per cent of upper-caste bureaucrats decide the fate of Dalits and the poor has found resonance among these communities. With Rahul Gandhi aggressively shaping the Dalit narrative, Modi appears left with little option but to reposition himself. Yet he faces competition not only from regional leaders but also from the BJP’s own targeted outreach strategies. After V.P. Singh, no national leader could fully capture the imagination of Dalits as a Mandal Messiah, although regional leaders like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Prasad Yadav, Ram Vilas Paswan, and Nitish Kumar emerged as protagonists of Mandal politics. Over time, however, they came to be seen largely as caste leaders rather than representatives of collective Dalit empowerment. Experts and liberals fear the emergence of violent protests similar to those witnessed after the Mandal Commission’s implementation in 1990. Upper-caste students in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh have already taken to the streets against the UGC’s Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations, 2026. Sit-in protests have been organised across universities, with demonstrators claiming that the rules would lead to caste conflict and disrupt social harmony on campuses. Critics argue that the rules are one-sided and lack safeguards against false complaints. They question the effectiveness of “Equity Squads” and the potential for increased conflict. The regulations require every university and college to establish an Equal Opportunity Centre and an Equity Committee, with representation from SC, ST, and OBC communities. Institutions must address complaints within 24 hours, failing which they risk severe penalties. The 2026 regulations mark a legally binding step towards safer and more equitable campuses, aiming to curb the sharp rise in reported caste-based discrimination cases between 2019 and 2024. Yet a crucial question remains: why did the Modi government choose this moment and this mechanism to introduce such rules? In 2022, the Supreme Court had directed the UGC to formulate accessibility guidelines for students with
Kanimozhi meets Rahul in Delhi
Chennai/Delhi: DMK parliamentary party leader K Kanimozhi met Congress leader Rahul Gandhi at his residence in New Delhi on Wednesday, when he urged the DMK to begin the seat-sharing talks for the Tamil Nadu assembly election at the earliest. DMK as well as Congress leaders said the talks were `pleasant and cordial.’ The subject of power sharing too cropped up during the discussions. Though the differences over power-sharing remain inconclusive, there was mutual respect for each other’s position, a Congress leader said. A DMK leader said the interaction helped ease tensions between the allies. Rahul Gandhi is learnt to have conveyed that the DMK should soon begin seat-sharing talks with the committee formed by Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge. The meeting has come a day after Tamil Nadu Congress election in-charge Girish Chodankar said they were waiting for nearly two months for a response from the DMK to begin formal alliance talks. Sources said the meeting between Kanimozhi and Rahul lasted for about 30-minutes. The interaction has reaffirmed the DMK – Congress alliance and put to rest speculation over alleged rifts. “Overall, it was cordial and positive,” he said. The focus of Wednesday’s meeting was on starting negotiations and that the number of seats were not discussed. Both sides agreed that formal talks would begin after chief minister MK Stalin constituted a negotiation committee, expected in early February. Congress general secretary KC Venugopal is likely to visit Tamil Nadu in the first week of February for the talks, party sources said. The meeting Rahul – Kanimozhi meeting has gained significance as a section of the state Congress was pushing for a larger share of seats and a coalition govt. Some Congress leaders publicly supported actor Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam as a possible alternative, reflecting the unease within the party. The DMK has rejected the proposal for sharing power. “I am confident that we will together arrive at a good solution,” said K Selvaperunthagai, TNCC president. After the alliance framework is finalised, Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi are expected to campaign in the state. Their planned January visit for village committee meetings was postponed due to the delay in concluding seat-sharing. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Rahul Gandhi to join stir seeking NREGA reinstatement in AP
Vijayawada: APCC chief YS Sharmila announced that senior Congress leader and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi will soon launch an agitation against the BJP-led NDA centre from Andhra Pradesh at Bandlapalli, where the NREGA scheme was first launched two decades ago, demanding the Centre to roll back the VB-G RAM G Act and reinstate the NREGA in its original form. Sharmila met Rahul Gandhi in New Delhi on Tuesday and requested him to participate in the agitation campaign. Responding positively to Sharmila’s request, Rahul Gandhi agreed to visit AP and take part in the agitation. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
From Bihar, which shook Indira’s power, now a challenge is being sounded against Rahul! Why did a lifelong Congressman call him a coward?
History is witness that sparks of protest rising from Bihar often shake the power in Delhi. After Indira Gandhi, a front has now opened against Rahul Gandhi from Bihar itself. Former Union Minister Dr. Shakeel Ahmed, a lifelong Congressman, has left the party and called Rahul a “coward” and “incompetent,” which is casting a shadow of crisis over the “shop of love.” Patna: The movement against Indira Gandhi started from Bihar, which led to the end of her rule. Now, the loudest voice of protest against Rahul Gandhi has resonated across the country from Bihar. History is witness that a voice of protest emanating from Bihar is never ineffective. Lest it happen that love departs from the shop of love, and only an empty shop remains. Why are those who love Congress leaving it? In reality, there cannot be a shop of love because it is a matter of the heart. Love is not a commodity that can be found in a shop. Now, the owner and proprietor of the shop (Rahul Gandhi) himself is being accused of lacking both competence and courage. Former Union Minister Dr. Shakeel Ahmed has been a lifelong Congressman. But what happened that he first left the Congress and is now calling Rahul Gandhi a cowardly leader? Grandfather was an MLA in 1937, father and son were MLAs 5 times each Can only those who flatter Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi remain in Congress? Can those with independent opinions not survive in Congress? Three generations of Dr. Shakeel Ahmed’s family served the Congress. His grandfather, Ahmed Ghafoor, was elected to the Bihar Assembly from Congress in 1937. His father, Shakur Ahmed, was an MLA five times from Congress between 1952 and 1977. After 1985, Shakeel Ahmed himself was a Congress MLA five times. He was also a Member of Parliament and a Union Minister. But after the 2025 assembly elections, he left the Congress party. If Shakeel Ahmed, a member of such a dedicated Congress family, has accused Rahul Gandhi of cowardice, there must be some truth to it. Rahul Gandhi lacks an understanding of electoral issues! If someone shows Rahul Gandhi a mirror, instead of fixing his appearance, he becomes intent on breaking the mirror. When Shakeel Ahmed left the party, he said that he still has unwavering faith in the party’s policies, but he has differences with some individuals at the top of the organization. This means his displeasure is with Rahul Gandhi. Some disgruntled Congress leaders say that Rahul Gandhi lacks an understanding of electoral issues. In Bihar, he worked tirelessly for 17 days through the Voter Rights Yatra to make SIR (State Information Commission) an election issue. He tried to create a favorable atmosphere by raising the slogan “Vote thief, leave the throne.” But all his efforts went in vain because it was not an issue in the eyes of the public. Not a single complaint was received against SIR. The debate on Rahul Gandhi’s shortcomings has started again. After Shakeel Ahmed’s statement, the debate on Rahul Gandhi’s shortcomings has intensified once again. It is alleged that Rahul Gandhi has destroyed the internal democracy of the party. When he resigned from the post of Congress president after the electoral defeat, he should have worked for the organization with a clear heart. He should have handed over the reins of the party to a capable leader from outside the family. But Rahul Gandhi could not free himself from the feeling of being the super boss. He did appoint Mallikarjun Kharge, a leader from outside the family, as president, but he kept all the powers in his own hands. Kharge is just a president in name; all the decisions are taken by Rahul Gandhi. Kharge’s signature is just a formality. Now, there is opposition to Rahul Gandhi even at the district level in Bihar. This strong voice against Rahul Gandhi emanating from Bihar will resonate far and wide. Now, even at the district level, Congress leaders have started questioning Rahul Gandhi’s incompetence. Currently, Bihar Congress leaders are holding public meetings in the districts under the ‘Save MNREGA Campaign’. A public meeting was held in Darbhanga on Tuesday. During this time, local leader Ram Narayan accused Rahul Gandhi, saying that the Congress party would not progress in Bihar until the buying and selling of tickets stopped. Local leaders started chanting slogans against Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru and state president Rajesh Ram. Authored by: Ashok Kumar Sharma • Edited by: Sunil Pandey About the Author Ashok Kumar Sharma is a senior journalist. He has more than three decades of experience in journalism. He understands the politics and society of Bihar very well and analyzes the changes taking place there with keen observation. He has done special reporting on Lok Sabha and Assembly elections in Bihar. Courtesy: Hindi News