US top court nixes Trump admin’s bid to restrict medical care for transgender inmates
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to let President Donald Trump’s administration immediately enforce restrictions on medical care for transgender inmates, leaving in place a lower-court order that allows treatments to continue while a legal challenge proceeds. The brief order did not explain the court’s reasoning. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, saying they would have allowed the policy to take effect as the case moved through the lower courts. The policy followed an executive order by Trump, a Republican who has taken several steps to roll back transgender rights during his second term. It directs the Bureau of Prisons to revise its medical care rules so that federal funds are not spent “for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.” Under the policy, prisons would halt gender-affirming surgeries, gradually withdraw hormone therapy and end social accommodations such as makeup and wigs. Mental health services would continue to be available. Transgender inmates challenged the restrictions in court. US District Judge Royce Lamberth ordered that their treatments continue. Lamberth, who was nominated by Republican President Ronald Reagan, noted that untreated gender dysphoria can cause severe side effects, including depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts. The Trump administration appealed, arguing that the treatments raised security concerns and “could no longer be justified”. A divided appeals court panel declined to lift the block, prompting the administration to approach the Supreme Court. About 600 inmates were receiving hormone therapy in 2025, according to court records cited by the Bureau of Prisons. Lawyers for the inmates argued that withdrawing treatment would have significant effects on their bodies and mental health. They also said the government had not presented evidence of security problems linked to hormone therapy for transgender inmates during the 30 years it had been provided. The Supreme Court has previously allowed other Trump administration policies affecting transgender people to take effect while legal challenges continued. These include restrictions on military service and passport sex markers. The conservative-majority court has also upheld state laws banning certain medical treatments for transgender minors and restricting transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
NYT exec gunned down by in-laws was transgender, faced child cruelty charges
According to court records, 40-year-old Jonathan McKinsey had been in fierce legal battles with his estranged wife and her parents. While she accused him of child cruelty and domestic violence, he countered with a tit-for-tat filing wherein he claimed that she and her parents were in fact abusive. new york times executive killed chinese in laws transgender sex change daughter medical tubes child cruelty restraining order united states Jonathan McKinsey headed the New York Times Games and was killed by Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen at a parking lot in California. (Photo: Social media) The 40-year-old New York Times executive, Jonathan McKinsey, who was gunned down by his 77-year-old in-laws in California, had been involved in a bitter dispute with them and his estranged wife over his transgender identity and child cruelty charges, according to court documents. Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen killed McKinsey at a parking lot in the middle of the day before a passing cop caught and arrested them. Police received multiple 911 calls from residents after several gunshots were heard and while first responders tried to save the tech executive, he was declared dead on the scene. Now, court records obtained by The Mercury News have revealed that his estranged wife and the accused’s daughter, Candice Jang, had filed for a restraining order against McKinsey in October 2025. She claimed that McKinsey struck their six-year-old son in the face during a fight over LEGO, leaving the child with a “handprint” shaped bruise. She also alleged that in 2018 he had been violent with her when he grabbed her wrist hard enough to leave bruises. At the time, deputies arrived at their home to check on the allegations and found the couple’s two-year-old child left unattended in a bedroom upstairs while he was away shopping. McKinsey was eventually charged with cruelty and corporal injury to a child, and was released on a USD 50,000 bail. Then, in December last year, McKinsey countered by filing a protection order against his wife, alleging that she was the one who had been abusive to him for 15 years. He claimed that in 2013, she thrashed him with a frying pan and, prior to that, in 2010, she attempted to pull medical tubes out of his body when he was undergoing a sex transition process. He also alleged that Jang’s father, who was not named in the filing, punched him in the chest while he was recovering from a double mastectomy. He alleged that his mother-in-law called him a “disgusting queer” and a “pervert” after they had a fallout over one of McKinsey’s children’s clothing choices. The New York Times tech executive also filed for a divorce the same month. He and Jang married in 2011. The estranged couple remained embroiled in a child custody battle, with a court hearing scheduled for Friday, October 2, Mercury News reported. Despite these revelations, it is not yet clear if arguments between McKinsey and his in-laws over gender identity and child cruelty charges were the motivations behind them killing the tech executive. Jonathan McKinsey was at the parking lot of the Dublin Sports Grounds in Dublin, California, when reportedly two masked people approached him before opening fire. The accused couple allegedly took turns shooting their son-in-law before a police officer who happened to be in the area arrested them. Courtesy : India Today Note: This news is originally published on https:/indiatoday.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
‘Took turns shooting’: Trans NYT executive killed by in-laws amid anti-LGBTQ+ allegations
A trans New York Times engineering executive was shot dead in broad daylight at a California sports complex, allegedly by his elderly in-laws, with witnesses saying the couple took turns shooting him before calmly walking away from the scene. Jonathan McKinsey, 40, director of engineering for New York Times Games and Player Experience, was found with multiple gunshot wounds at Dublin Sports Grounds in Dublin, California, shortly after 3pm Saturday. He was pronounced dead at the scene. Police arrested his in-laws, Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen, both 77, near the scene and booked them into Santa Rita Jail on suspicion of murder and other charges. Witnesses had alerted police after seeing the shooting, and the couple remained in the area when officers arrived. Police have not publicly established a motive. Man Killed In-Laws Arrested Transgender identity at centre of family dispute McKinsey was transgender, and court filings show that his gender identity became part of the wider conflict with his wife and her family. In a petition seeking a domestic violence protection order, McKinsey alleged that his mother-in-law, Chen, had directed anti-LGBTQ+ slurs at him and one of their children, according to court records cited by The Mercury News and AP. He also made allegations against his wife involving medical procedures related to his transition. The court-document-based report reviewed also stated McKinsey transitioned from female to male in 2010. It also describes a bitter dispute between him and his in-laws over his being transgender. The allegations were part of a much broader legal battle between McKinsey and his wife, Candice Jang. They had three young children and were involved in divorce and custody proceedings when he was killed. Jang had sought a domestic violence protection order against McKinsey, while McKinsey later sought one against her and filed for divorce. Custody fight turned increasingly bitter Court records show that Jang had accused McKinsey of physically disciplining their children. He was charged with misdemeanor child abuse and was out on bail while seeking entry into a mental-health diversion programme, according to AP. He had been limited to supervised visits with his children and was seeking greater access to them. Jang’s court filings also alleged that McKinsey had threatened to kill her and her parents. In one filing, she described a children’s book about a mother dying as frightening because of those alleged threats. Those claims remain allegations contained in the family’s legal proceedings. The couple’s legal battle was still active when McKinsey was killed, with a court hearing scheduled shortly afterward. His death therefore came against the backdrop of an increasingly bitter dispute over their children, allegations of domestic and child abuse, and McKinsey’s claims of anti-LGBTQ+ hostility within the family. Police have not said that McKinsey’s transgender identity or the allegations surrounding it were the motive for the shooting. Zhang and Chen are due to appear in court Wednesday, where the charges against them are expected to be formally addressed. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Sophie Cunningham delivers blunt Enes Kanter Freedom response after controversial WNBA transgender sports campaign
Sophie Cunningham has made it clear that Enes Kanter Freedom’s push to enter the WNBA is not something she wants to get involved in. Speaking to ESPN, the Indiana Fever guard addressed Kanter Freedom and Royce White declaring for the WNBA Draft and chose to keep her response focused on her own team. Her comments come after Kanter Freedom repeatedly referred to Cunningham while speaking about his campaign against the league’s transgender eligibility rules. For Cunningham, the timing is important. Indiana is heading into the final four games of the regular season, with the team still fighting for a strong playoff position. Rather than spend her energy on the debate surrounding Kanter Freedom, she said her attention is on the Fever and what happens on the court. “I’m gonna let them do them,” Cunningham said. “I’m just focused on the Fever and on our sport. I think we have four more games left. I’m trying to just really dial in and keep the main thing the main thing.” Sophie Cunningham responds as Enes Kanter Freedom pushes WNBA campaign Kanter Freedom has made Cunningham part of the conversation because their views on transgender participation in women’s sports overlap. Cunningham has previously said she supports restricting transgender girls and women from girls’ and women’s sports. At the same time, she has rejected claims that this means she hates transgender people. The former NBA player has also described Cunningham as “my friend.” His campaign drew more attention after he attended Indiana’s Aug. 23 game against the Chicago Sky wearing a shirt that defined a woman as an “adult human female.” He was later ejected after an exchange with Sky guard Natasha Cloud. Kanter Freedom subsequently said Cunningham texted him, “What happened?” after the incident. Cunningham has not publicly confirmed that account, and her latest comments do not suggest that she has joined his campaign. Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham puts basketball first Cunningham’s position on the wider issue has not changed, but she is separating that position from Kanter Freedom’s actions. She previously told ESPN, “I think that I am here to extend love. But I also think with that love is truth.” Now, her priority is the Fever. Cunningham is averaging 8.3 points, 2.3 rebounds and 1.3 assists this season as Indiana heads toward the playoffs. With only four regular-season games remaining, Cunningham says she does not want outside controversy taking attention away from the team’s postseason push. Her latest comments therefore draw a clear boundary: she can have her own views on transgender participation in sports without becoming part of Kanter Freedom’s WNBA campaign. Courtesy : TOI Note: This news is originally published on https:/timesofindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Delhi: 4 illegal Bangladeshi nationals disguised as transgender held
The Foreigner Cell of Delhi’s North-West District apprehended four illegal Bangladeshi nationals in Jahangir Puri. The suspects, caught near Bhalaswa Flyover, were disguised as transgender persons and lacked valid travel or identity documents. In a continued drive against illegal immigration, the Foreigner Cell of North-West District apprehended four illegal Bangladeshi nationals in Jahangir Puri, Delhi, in an operation conducted in the early hours of the morning near Bhalaswa Flyover. Acting on specific intelligence, the team intercepted the suspects, who were found in the area disguised as transgender persons. During sustained questioning and verification, it was established that they were Bangladeshi nationals illegally residing in India without any valid travel or identity documents. Details of the Raid and Investigation According to the Delhi Police, the Foreigner Cell of North-West District had been monitoring suspicious activities based on surveillance and secret information. The team conducted an early morning raid near Bhalaswa Flyover, PS Jahangir Puri, on September 7. Delhi Police, in their statement, also said that at the instance of the secret informer, the team apprehended four suspicious persons. During initial questioning, the suspects failed to produce any valid travel or identity documents. Detailed verification of documents, digital footprints and sustained interrogation established that they were Bangladeshi nationals illegally residing in India. During the investigation, five smartphones installed with the banned IMO application and Bangladeshi national identity documents stored in the phone gallery were recovered. According to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, North-West District, Delhi, the apprehended individuals have been identified as Saikat alias Megha Das (35), Md Nur Mohammad (21), Nazimuddin alias Neha Kakkan (29), and Md Zahid Hasan alias Shivangi Roy (23), all hailing from various districts in Bangladesh. Necessary legal action was initiated as per the provisions of law. The apprehended Bangladeshi national was produced before the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO), and deportation proceedings were initiated as per the established procedure. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianetnews Editorial staff and is published from a syndicated feed.) Courtesy : Asianet News Note: This news is originally published on https:/asianetnews.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Delhi Police arrests illegal Bangladeshi national, disguised as transgender, for illegal activities
In a major action, Delhi Police has arrested an illegal Bangladeshi national. He was living in India illegally and posing as a transgender woman to carry out illegal activities. Delhi Police arrests illegal Bangladeshi national, Image Source: ANI Delhi Police has arrested a 24-year-old Bangladeshi national who was living in India illegally and posing as a transgender woman to carry out illegal activities. The Foreigners Cell of the North-West District arrested Mohammad Abdul Aleem (also known as Preeti) near the NS Mandi in the Mahendra Park police station area of Jahangirpuri in the early morning hours of July 14, 2026. Acting on information, a police team apprehended the suspect, who was roaming suspiciously in the area. Several things revealed during interrogation During interrogation, Aleem could not produce any valid Indian travel or identity documents. Further investigation and questioning confirmed that he was a Bangladeshi citizen from Mokapur village in Khulna district. He admitted that he had undergone gender-affirming surgery and often disguised himself as a woman by wearing makeup, saris, salwar-suits, wigs, and adopting feminine mannerisms. He reportedly used this disguise primarily for illegal activities at night. Several things recovered Police also recovered a smartphone from Aleem, which contained the banned IMO app, and the phone’s gallery contained photos of his Bangladeshi national identity documents. The operation was conducted by a team led by SI Sapan, under the supervision of ACP Ranjit Dhaka, Inspector Vipin Kumar, and the supervision of ACP Sapan. Alim was produced before the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) and deportation proceedings have been initiated against him as per the law. This arrest is part of the Delhi Police’s ongoing campaign against illegal immigration in the national capital. Seven illegal Bangladeshis were also arrested last year. Earlier last year, on July 1, 2025, Delhi Police arrested seven illegal Bangladeshi nationals, including five transgender people, from the city’s Shalimar Bagh area. According to the police, three smartphones were recovered from them. Police also said that an app banned in India was found on these mobile phones, through which these people used to communicate with their families in Bangladesh. Police also said that a deported Bangladeshi national who had entered India illegally for the second time was arrested again. Written By: Ritu Raj Courtesy: Hindi News
Neo-Nazi Who Claims to Be Transgender Sent to Women’s Prison in Germany Amid Mockery Concerns
The 55-year-old far-right activist failed to report to prison last August to serve a 1.5-year sentence for slander and incitement to hatred. They were placed in a women’s prison in Chemnitz, Saxony, despite suspicions of exploiting gender laws. Liebich legally changed gender while appealing the sentence, a move widely seen as mocking Germany’s self-determination act introduced under Olaf Scholz. A self-proclaimed transgender neo-Nazi has been transferred to a women’s prison in Germany amid accusations of exploiting the country’s gender self-identification laws. Marla-Svenja Liebich, born male and originally named “Sven” before legally registering as a woman, was extradited on Wednesday from the Czech Republic to a prison in Chemnitz, Saxony. The German far-right provocateur, who has been photographed at rallies wearing a Nazi-style uniform, had gone on the run last August after failing to report to serve a one-and-a-half-year jail sentence for slander and incitement to hatred. While appealing the 2023 conviction, the 55-year-old changed legal gender under a reform that eased the process. Liebich’s “transition” was widely seen as a deliberate mockery of the self-determination act, triggering intense debate over possible abuse of the law. The reforms, introduced by Olaf Scholz’s centrist coalition, simplified changing one’s name and gender on official documents. Appearing publicly in women’s clothing while sporting a moustache, Liebich claimed the change and request for a female prison were needed to avoid “discrimination” from male inmates. Sven Liebich was a prominent figure in Germany’s anti-vaccine movement during the Covid pandemic before adopting a woman’s name. Credit: Craig Stennett/Getty Images In 2022, Liebich disrupted an LGBTQ pride parade in Halle, labelling participants “parasites on society”, according to activists. A local prosecutor said Liebich was “co-operative” during extradition. Prison authorities are now deciding how to carry out the sentence. German officials previously confirmed the placement in a women’s prison was based on registered gender, not biological sex. Liebich has been a longstanding activist in eastern Germany’s right-wing extremist circles and is classified by Saxony’s intelligence services as a “Right-wing extremist” operating statewide and nationally. Photos show the activist at protests featuring black-clad marchers with red, white and black flags, wearing an armband reading “Sicherheits-Abteilung” (“security department”) — the same initials as the Nazi Brownshirts (SA). Former Chancellor Olaf Scholz had defended the gender reforms, stating: “We show respect to trans, intersex and non-binary people, without taking anything away from others. This is how we continue to drive the modernisation of our country. This includes recognising realities of life and making them possible by law.” The case has since drawn sharp criticism, prompting the new government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz to commit to reviewing the law. (inputs from The Telegraph) Courtesy : Outlook India Note: This news is originally published on https:/outlookindia.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Bangladeshi man disguised as transgender nabbed in Delhi’s Bhalswa
Delhi Police arrested a 44-year-old illegal Bangladeshi national, Sukanta Chandra Das, under Bhalswa Flyover. He disguised himself as a transgender person at night to engage in illegal activities. Deportation proceedings have been initiated. In a continued drive against illegal immigration, Delhi Police apprehended one illegal Bangladeshi national during an operation conducted in the early hours of the morning under Bhalswa Flyover, within the jurisdiction of Jahangir Puri police station. Acting on specific intelligence, the team intercepted the suspect, who was found moving in the area disguised as a transgender person. During sustained questioning and verification, it was established that he was a Bangladeshi national illegally residing in India without any valid travel or identity documents. It was further revealed that he used to disguise himself as a transgender person during the night to engage in illegal activities. The Delhi police informed that in the case of the secret informer, the team apprehended one suspicious person. During initial questioning, the suspect failed to produce any valid travel or identity documents. Detailed verification of documents, digital footprints and sustained interrogation established that he was a Bangladeshi national illegally residing in India. During interrogation, he disclosed that he used to disguise himself as a transgender person during the night to engage in illegal activities, police said. Investigation Reveals Key Evidence During the investigation, one smartphone installed with the banned IMO application and Bangladeshi national identity documents stored in the phone gallery was recovered, press release stated. Necessary legal action was initiated as per the provisions of law. The apprehended Bangladeshi national was produced before the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO), and deportation proceedings were initiated as per the established procedure. Suspect Identified The Delhi Police disclosed the details and said the apprehended individual is identified as Sukanta Chandra Das, alias Madhuri, a 44-year-old male. A resident of Village Baria, P.O. Bhawal Baria 1700, P.S. Gazipur Sadar, District Gazipur, Dhaka, Bangladesh. The suspect was taken into custody following the recovery of evidence, which includes one smartphone containing the banned IMO application and various Bangladeshi National Identity documents recovered from the phone gallery, police said. (ANI) (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.) Courtesy : Asianet News Note: This news is originally published on https:/asianetnews.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights
Khawaja Asif: ‘Rahul Gandhi too,’ Pakistan’s Defense Minister furious over India’s counterattack, spews venom over PM Modi’s award
Khawaja Asif: Pakistani leaders are unable to digest the highest honors bestowed upon Prime Minister Modi by countries around the world. Pakistan’s Information Minister Ataullah Tarar and Defense Minister Khawaja Asif have criticized Modi’s international honors. Khawaja Asif targeted the honors bestowed upon PM Modi India called the Pakistani Defense Minister ‘mentally unstable’ Khawaja Asif mentioned Rahul Gandhi and The Guardian in his post Khawaja Asif enraged after India called him ‘mentally unstable’ Islamabad/New Delhi: Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif is furious after India called him ‘mentally unstable’. He said on Sunday that personal attacks on him by India will neither solve the problems facing New Delhi nor restore Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “sagging” credibility at home and abroad. The Defense Minister of this Islamic country, which failed to stop Indian missile attacks, has once again lied and talked about defeating India. Accusing them of spreading “propaganda,” Asif said that the attacks on him are an attempt to divert attention from questions about Modi’s international image and the credibility of foreign honors received by the Indian Prime Minister. In his post, Khawaja Asif referred to Indian leader Rahul Gandhi, who had criticized PM Modi’s award. Khwaja Asif enraged by India’s response Khwaja Asif also referred to a report in the British newspaper “The Guardian,” saying that both had questioned the credibility of some awards received by Modi. He wrote, “Hounding me will not solve the problem.” Calling me mentally unstable will not stabilize Modi’s woefully declining credibility at home and abroad, especially after last year’s defeat to Pakistan. He further wrote, “Rahul Gandhi is making the same claim about Modi’s awards, saying they are AI-generated or manually managed to project the image of a global statesman. This has actually enhanced his reputation as a global fraud.” He further added, “Even a respected newspaper, ‘The Guardian,’ raised this issue and questioned the credibility of those awards.” He said that Modi’s desperate attempts to obtain fake honors from abroad are an attempt to stabilize his credibility, which is “woefully shaky at home.” Pakistan is unable to digest Modi’s awards Pakistani leaders are unable to digest the highest honors bestowed upon Prime Minister Modi by the world’s nations. Pakistan’s Information Minister Ataullah Tarar and Defense Minister Khawaja Asif accused Modi of turning international honors into a deliberate public relations campaign. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has received the highest civilian and state honors from 34 countries and international organizations since 2016. He is the Indian leader with the most international honors in history. PM Modi has received the highest honors from countries such as Norway, Sweden, Israel, Russia (Order of St. Andrew the Apostle—Russia’s highest civilian honor), France (highest civilian and military honors), the United States (Legion of Merit—Chief Commander Degree), Kuwait, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, the Maldives, Palestine, and Afghanistan. Curated by: Abhijat Shekhar Azad About the Author Abhijat Shekhar Azad is an international affairs and defense journalist at Navbharat Times Online. He has nearly 17 years of experience in various news channels and digital journalism. Courtesy: Hindi News
Trump faces setback on birthright citizenship order, hails US Supreme Court ruling on transgender athletes as ‘Big win’
The US Supreme Court struck down Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship but upheld state laws barring transgender athletes from competing in women’s and girls’ sports. “BIG WIN”: Trump after US SC upholds state laws barring transgender athletes from women’s sports(Photo Credit: x.com/WhiteHouse) US President Donald Trump received both a setback and a victory as the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump’s executive order and upheld birth right citizenship for all children born in the United States. Moreover, Trump also hailed the US Supreme Court’s decision upholding state laws that bar transgender athletes from competing in women’s and girls’ sports. Terming it a Big win, Trump wrote, “BIG WIN: The United States Supreme Court just RULED AGAINST MEN PLAYING IN WOMEN’S SPORTS.” “Wow! That takes that ridiculous situation off the table!!!” He made this announcement on the Truth Social platform. What did the Supreme Court rule on transgender athletes in women’s sports? Trump’s statement came after the US Supreme Court decision to uphold laws in Idaho and West Virginia that restrict transgender athletes from participating in women’s and girls’ sports. The court held that Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, permits schools to maintain separate sports teams based on biological sex. Read more: ‘Very possible that they will never…’: Trump breaks silence after US strikes Iran following attack on Panama-flagged tanker As per the Politico, the court’s conservative majority also denied claims that the laws infringe upon the constitutional rights of transgender individuals. This was a landmark decision in relation to the legal challenge pertaining to transgender athletes competing in schools. How did Donald Trump react to the Supreme Court’s two major rulings? Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, stated, “The Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women’s and girls’ sports throughout America.”The ruling came in challenges to laws enacted by Idaho and West Virginia, both of which argued that the measures are intended to protect athletes assigned female at birth from physical disadvantages arising from biological differences between males and females. The states also maintained that Title IX applies based on biological sex and that the laws do not discriminate against transgender women and girls, Politico reported. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the court’s liberal wing, argued that the court should have required states to justify the restrictions for specific sports and categories of transgender athletes rather than upholding broad bans.”To the majority, the fit here is simply good enough,” Sotomayor wrote, accusing the court of relying on “overbroad generalisations” instead of allowing lower courts to undertake a more detailed review, according to Politico. Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the ruling, “Consistent with Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause, we hold that the states may maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females. They may determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex. The Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women’s and girls’ sports throughout America.” Written by: Sumaila Zaman Edited by: Sumaila Zaman Courtesy : India.com Note: This news is originally published on https:/india.com/bha and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially human rights