Durga Puja vs Muharram: Why can’t two communities celebrate together, Calcutta HC asks Mamata Banerjee

HC slams Mamata govt: The court said a mere assumption that a law-and-order situation might arise, owing to Vijaya Dashami and Muharram falling one after the other, could not be the basis of imposing curbs on immersion timings.

The Calcutta High Court on Wednesday slammed the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government over its recent notification on Durga idol immersion. “Why can’t two communities celebrate together? When you (state government) are firm there is communal harmony in the state, why are you creating communal distinction between the two? Let them live in harmony. Do not create a line between them. Let them live together,” the court observed.

Mamata Banerjee, in a notification last month, imposed barred immersion of idols after 6 PM on September 30 and on October 1 on account of Muharram. The immersions would continue from October 2. It later said that the immersions would be allowed till 10 PM on September 30.

The order triggered a row with the BJP, Vishwa Hindu Parishad and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh accusing the government of interfering with the rights of Hindus in order to appease Muslim voters.

Hearing three PILs challenging the restrictions on immersion of idols at the end of the five-day Durga Puja festival, a bench, also comprising Justice Harish Tandon, said a mere assumption that a law-and-order situation might arise, owing to Vijaya Dashami and Muharram falling one after the other, could not be the basis of imposing curbs on immersion timings.

Observing that Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had herself told a public meeting that Hindus and Muslims lived together in harmony in the state, the bench said, “Listen to what the head of the state says and not a police officer.” “People have the right to practise their religious activities, whichever community they may be of, and the State cannot put restrictions, unless it has a concrete ground to believe that two communities cannot live together,” the acting chief justice said.

“You must clarify why are you apprehending a law-and-order situation,” the bench told state Advocate General (AG) Kishore Dutta, who claimed that it was the administration’s prerogative to decide on steps to prevent any untoward situation. “Public order and law-and-order are administrative issues,” Dutta submitted, while claiming that the court’s interference in it would amount to trudging into the administration’s domain.

The bench said the administration could regulate the routes for the immersion processions to follow and those through which the ‘Tajia’ processions of Muharram would pass. “In the interest of maintaining law-and-order and in order to prevent an untoward incident, the administration can regulate a religious congregation or procession,” the AG submitted before the court. “It is a preventive action to rule out any possibility of a law-and-order situation,” he said.

The court observed that it was not disputing the state’s right to regulate, but the administration could not restrict the observance of one’s religious rights. “We are asking you to eliminate the element of arbitrariness and provide a concrete ground for your action,” the bench said.

“If you say there is complete harmony, are you (the state administration) not creating a line of division between the two communities by your action?” asked Justice Tandon.

When the AG reiterated that the state had taken the decision to prevent any untoward incident, the acting chief justice observed, “Let them live in harmony, do not create a line between them.” The court further said it was advocating peace, harmony and living together. The hearing in the three PILs was concluded and the order is scheduled to be passed tomorrow.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Check Also

Women account for 55pc of total PR candidates

Nov 20, 2017-The number of candidates contesting in the proportional representation (PR) ...